Use of Innovative Sustainable and Durable Materials in Concrete Pavements
Updated: May 26
Location: Monticello, Minnesota
Award: Lower Carbon Concrete
Project Team
Owner and Engineer: Minnesota Department of Transportation
Contractors: C. S. McCrossan (Prime) and subsidiary PCi Roads, LLC (Paving Subcontractor) Concrete and Slag Cement: Holcim

To establish the durability and constructability of emerging sustainable concrete mixtures, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) selected four slag cement based cementitious systems for evaluation in test cells within the MnROAD Test Facility, a 2.5 mile (4 km) section of Interstate 94 (I-94) that is used to test pavement designs and materials. The cells included two mixtures using PLC-based blended cements, a mixture using an ASTM C1157/C1157M cement, and a mixture using an alkali-activated cement; and all four mixtures used slag cement as a major component, were produced using a conventional ready mixed batching process, and were placed using a conventional slip-form paving machine. Construction was completed in September 2024, and evaluation will continue through 2027.
The SCA cooperated in this study to demonstrate the performance of blended cements with significant slag cement contents and to demonstrate emerging applications where slag cement is the predominate component of the cementitious material. To accomplish the first goal, the SCA proposed a quinary blend comprising Type IL(8) blended cement along with 24% slag cement, 20% Class F fly ash, and 8% natural pozzolan. A second mixture, developed by Holcim, comprised Type IL(8) cement with 20% slag cement and 30% Class F fly ash. A third mixture, provided by Ozinga, comprised an ASTM C1157/C1157M slag cement blended with Type IL(8) cement. Lastly, C-Crete provided a product comprising slag cement blended with a dry alkali activator.




Application Type
Application Type | |
% Slag Cement Replacement | |
% Portland Cement | |
% Portland Limestone Cement | |
% Other SCM (if applicable) | |
Aggregate | Optimized meeting the requirements of MnDOT 2301.2C.3 of the 2020 Spec Book (see Table 1). |
Water/cement ratio | SCA mixture – 0.38, Holcim mixture – 0.40, Ozinga mixture – 0.41, C-Crete mixture – 0.32 |
7-day strengths | See plots |
28-day strengths | See plots |

The theme of following curiosity through everyday information makes me curious about what people notice in their own everyday experiences. A clear question can turn a casual interest into something easier to explore. That thought gives me a starting point for exploring Keembest learning ideas in connection with Keembest. I am still thinking through the practical side, because the context can change what seems useful. How do you decide which detail deserves a closer look before moving on?
I find following curiosity through everyday information easier to approach when there is a familiar situation to start from. A clear question can turn a casual interest into something easier to explore. The name Ithangye gives this theme a memorable reference point, while Ithangye learning ideas keeps the subject in focus. I would rather explore one useful example carefully than pretend that the whole subject is already clear. How do you decide which detail deserves a closer look before moving on?
Bài viết rất hữu ích và chi tiết, cảm ơn tác giả đã chia sẻ!
The idea of following curiosity through everyday information gives me a reason to slow down and consider the details. A clear question can turn a casual interest into something easier to explore. That practical perspective helps me frame Hebeizc learning ideas as a theme for Hebeizc. A simple comparison would help me picture the differences without rushing towards a fixed answer. How do you decide which detail deserves a closer look before moving on?
Mình cũng từng thấy B33 được nhắc trong vài cuộc thảo luận nên tò mò vào xem thử. Ấn tượng đầu tiên là giao diện khá gọn, các mục được sắp xếp tương đối dễ nhìn.